Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations

Search This Blog

Saturday, 25 July 2020

Sri Lankan University Ranking: Lessons To Be Learned 


Prof. Nalin Abeysekera
logoOnly Two Sri Lankan Universities can be seen in the list of world university rankings in the year 2020. “The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2020” includes almost 1,400 universities across 92 countries. Interestingly the University of Peradeniya has been included for the first time with a ranking between 401-500.  And University of Colombo at 1,001, which was last year in the 801-1000 category. It is important to understand what is this ranking method/s and why Sri Lankan Universities not able to position themselves into some places in Rankings.
What is this University ranking method/s?
It is important to note that there are several ranking methods in the world for Universities. We can see QS Rankings, Times Higher Education World University Rankings and Academic Ranking of World Universities(ARWU) and many more. Each rankings use different methodologies. 
QS ranking use six performance indicators relating to research, teaching, employability, and internationalization. They use the following six metrics.
1. Academic Reputation(40%)
2. Employer reputation(10%)
3. Faculty student ratio(20%)
4. Research citations per faculty member(20%)
5. Proportion  of international faculty (5%)
6. Proportion  of international Students (5%)
It can be seen that the 40% weightage has given for academic reputation which is based on an internal global academic survey. According to the intelligence unit of QS “The QS Global Academic Survey now stands as the largest survey of its type yet on the opinions of academics globally with a response of over 100,000 for the 2021 edition of the rankings”. And research citations per faculty member and faculty-student ratio also given prominence with 20% each. It is clear that global acceptance and research play a key role in this context.
What about Times Higher Education World University Rankings method? They Use 13 performance indicators as their methodology. Refer below for further elaboration.
1. Teaching (the learning environment) – 30%
* Reputation survey: 15%
* Staff-to-student ratio: 4.5%
* Doctorate-to-bachelor’s ratio: 2.25%
* Doctorates-awarded-to-academic-staff ratio: 6%
* Institutional income: 2.25%
2. Research (volume, income and reputation) – 30%
* Reputation survey: 18%
* Research income: 6%
* Research productivity: 6%
3. Citations (research influence) – 30%
4. International outlook (staff, students, research) – 7.5%
* Proportion of international students: 2.5%
* Proportion of international staff: 2.5%
* International collaboration: 2.5%
5. Industry income (knowledge transfer) – 2.5%
By looking at the indicators it is clear that 60% of weightage has given for research and citations. This is the uniqueness which can be seen  in Times Rankings.
Interestingly Academic Ranking of World  Universities (ARWU) using a different approach as their methodology 
1. ARWU  uses six objective indicators that are weighted as follows:t
2. Number of alumni who win Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals (10%)
3. Number of staff who win Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals (20%)
4. Number of highly cited researchers in 21 broad subject categories (20%)
5. Number of papers published in Nature and Science (20%)
6. Number of papers indexed in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index (20%)
7. Per capita academic performance of an institution (10%)
By looking at the rankings of ARWU it is clear that the traditional weightage system has been adopted as the methodology .
If you really compare QS Rankings, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and Academic Ranking of World  Universities(ARWU) you can see they use different mechanisms as methodology. Anyway the measurements like “academic reputation” is really debatable as it only reflects the reputation of given university rather than the actual performance.
Ranking of Sri Lankan Universities 
I have seen  Sri Lankan higher authorities used  Webometrics to rank universities in the past. Anyway, The Webometrics ranking is actually targeting to promote Web publication. There are certain measurements that have been used in this ranking consist of supporting Open Access initiatives, electronic access to scientific publications, and to other academic materials(Abeysekera,2011). Nevertheless, now we can see University Grant Commission (UGC ) has adopted scientific methods in ranking Sri Lankan universities. Anyway as mentioned earlier only two Sri Lankan universities are among 1400 universities around the globe. This is based on Times Higher Education World University Rankings. In this ranking method, 60% weightage is given for research and citations. Even you have given perfect teaching with quality lecturing you are in trouble! I think we need to reflect on whether Sri Lankan universities are teaching or research universities. We need to position our universities based on the competences. Some countries used their university colleges for more economic contributions with industry collaborations (they measure the performance of university by looking at how many dollars contributed per year for national income)  while universities concentrating for research. And the role of University academics should be properly defined by the authorities. There is a need to aware of the community on ranking methods and the mechanism. And I believe we need to have a holistic approach for this with the collaboration of all sectors (education as well as other industries with proper synergy). We need to see the big picture as Sri Lanka spends only 0.11% on research and development from GDP.

Read More

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.