Materiality & Moral Responsibility; The Dilemma Of Our Times

By Lasantha Pethiyagoda –MARCH 5, 2021

Prof. Lasantha Pethiyagoda

Sri Lanka was recently down-graded as a high-risk debtor. The Colombo stock market had two records also recently. One for the highest turnover and one for perhaps the lowest. The majority community has been put on a pedestal by the state, while the minorities stand demoted. Society has been turned on its head by a strange and addictive phenomenon. What might be this unwelcome development that is making this a topsy-turvy environment? The problem is the over emphasis on economic success for the promoters of the new world order, manifest in poor Sri Lanka as in parts of the developed world. Our land, hollowly boasting religious grandeur and history of civilization has instituted a de-emphasis on profoundly important things such as our relationships with other human beings as well as with our natural environment, giving way to corporate greed and opportunism instead.

This malady of vast proportions has in turn led to an unsustainable living environment where everyone who has the means wants ever more; submitting to their greed at every turn, rather than exercising control and consideration for others. This can be observed on public roads, offices and retail centres. Such irresponsible attitudes and consequent behaviour is applauded and admired in the prevalent political thinking which values enterprise over welfare.

This new hierarchy of values which reverse the traditional order, has infiltrated our fundamental institutional structures (secondary education, the professions and labour, national politics, urban and rural economy) through which destructive social norms are endorsed and crystallized. People tend to take great pride in conforming to this socially-constructed emerging hierarchy of values, defining themselves, their worth and success in terms of volume of money and extent of power, affiliation to seats of power and proceeding blindly in the vain search for an elusive happiness.

One must consider what the biggest ethical challenge facing us today is. The reality is that we have let personal economic success guide our lives, and in doing so, associated virtues of respect, cooperation, empathy, and compassion have been betrayed. The primacy that is allotted to materiality underlies and complicates daily challenges we face.

In other words, we have been overwhelmed by the pragmatics of the “corporate bottom line” that dominate our life-stage decision-making, turning money, which is essentially a means, into an end in itself, while turning fellow humans, ethically understood as “ends in themselves” into mere means of self-gain.

The traditionally virtuous concept that money is a resource that should be used in the service of our ethical ends such as ensuring that society functions in a way that addresses universal needs, is increasingly losing its relevance. Instead, due to our collective preoccupation with money, we have discarded our responsibility to individual and societal development and lost touch with our values, morals, and relationships with our community and the environment.

This inexorable move towards market-dominated paradigms that aims at transforming society into a ‘market society’, promoted by unscrupulous industrialists and their partners in exploitation has not only influenced the behaviour of individuals, government institutions, private organizations and multinational companies and domains of economic development, but also dampened intellectual diversity of ideas about what human progress actually means. Academic discourse is profoundly absent when it is most needed, perhaps hijacked by a crony coterie of opportunists.

Our society seems pre-occupied with money when its currency deteriorates like dew in daylight. We seem encouraged by parents, peers and societal norms to embrace wealth accumulation as our prime objective as the purchasing power of the rupee plummets. One dares not revolt against such paradigms created by the market culture although social costs are ongoing and most palpable to all.

Pecuniary goals induce pressure on educational institutions to refocus their priorities in favour of the pragmatic goal of profiting by preparing young people for the workforce in areas such as medicine, as if technical knowledge and skills are more important than history, identity, meaning, purpose, values, creativity, and vision.

In the corporate business world, investors do not see investing as anything but a financial one. Instead of viewing investment as an opportunity to use excess funds to support socially responsible corporate entities, investors are motivated simply to use undistributed profits to make even more money for themselves with contempt for whom they depend on for their lucre. Their blind and narrow purpose is to exploit venture opportunities most profitable, regardless of ethical considerations or their reputation for corporate social behaviour.

This degenerative culture of greed and profits has reduced people to being mere consumers devoid of their humanity. Our addiction to consumerism is not only promoted, but also required by the capitalist economic process which is driven by the interminable desire for profits and consumption.

Much of our population is of the “consumer class” with half of them residing in the struggling class. A lifestyle and culture that became common in Europe, North America and Japan in the twentieth century is going viral in the twenty-first in poor Sri Lanka.

Ironically though, individuals can live long and happy lives without using more than their “fair share” of common resources. Data shows that many residents of poor countries achieve levels of life satisfaction just as high as their wealthier counterparts with a lower material component in the former, implying that above a minimum level, there is no apparent correlation between per capita income and perception of life satisfaction.

Read More